ProActive Workflows & Scheduling
| ProActive Workflows & Scheduling is an open source middleware featuring Programming, Scheduling and Resourcing tools for parallel, distributed and multi-core computing. | |
 Workflows & Scheduling allows you to easily distribute and execute all company jobs and business applications, monitor activity and view jobs results. It ensures more work done with fewer resources, managing heterogeneous platforms, multiple sites. It maximizes utilization of both existing and Cloud IT infrastructures. | |
| Web site | http://proactive.activeeon.com/ |
|---|---|
| News |
Follow ActiveEon news at : https://www.activeeon.com/about/news |
| https://twitter.com/activeeon | |
| Awards | |
| Project leader(s) | Denis Caromel |
| Functionality | Application platform |
| Status | Mature |
| License(s) | Affero General Public License v1.0 |
| Standards | ETSI GCM Application Description ETSI GCM Fractal ADL ETSI GCM Interoperability Deployment |
| VCS repository(ies) | - type: git |
| Issue tracker URL | https://github.com/ow2-proactive/scheduling/issues |
| Discussion channels | |
| Datasheets | |
| Professional case studies | |
| Professional support | |
| Wikipedia page | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProActive |
2017 Market Award| Releases/Downloads |
|---|
Images
| Format | Download | Size |
|---|---|---|
 | ProActive_Workflows_and_Scheduling_1.0rev8_openstackqcow2 | 2310 MB |
| FOSSology | upload=103&folder=11&item=413775 |
|---|---|
| SonarQube | proactive workflows and scheduling |
| OpenHub | ProActive |
| Open Maturity Model | omm
Average OMM score by category |
| Metrics file | metrics.json |
| License | File count | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AGPL-3.0 | 940 | FOSSOlogy |
| No_license_found | 427 | FOSSOlogy |
| MPL | 12 | FOSSOlogy |
| Microsoft-possibility | 6 | FOSSOlogy |
| BSD | 6 | FOSSOlogy |
| Apache-2.0 | 5 | FOSSOlogy |
| MIT | 4 | FOSSOlogy |
| GPL-3.0 | 4 | FOSSOlogy |
| OFL-1.1 | 2 | FOSSOlogy |
| MIT-style | 2 | FOSSOlogy |
| MIT-possibility | 2 | FOSSOlogy |
| GPL-possibility | 2 | FOSSOlogy |
| GPL-2.0 | 2 | FOSSOlogy |
| Zlib | 1 | FOSSOlogy |
| See-file | 1 | FOSSOlogy |
| BSD-possibility | 1 | FOSSOlogy |
| BSD-2-Clause | 1 | FOSSOlogy |
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lines | 186,764 | SonarQube |
| Ncloc | 99,115 | SonarQube |
| Classes | 1,343 | SonarQube |
| Files | 1,133 | SonarQube |
| Directories | 247 | SonarQube |
| Functions | 7,539 | SonarQube |
| Accessors | 1,159 | SonarQube |
| Statements | 43,171 | SonarQube |
| Public API | 5,768 | SonarQube |
| Comment lines | 18,293 | SonarQube |
| Comment lines density | 15.6% | SonarQube |
| Public documented API density | 46.1% | SonarQube |
| Public undocumented API | 3,110 | SonarQube |
| Complexity | 18,291 | SonarQube |
| Class complexity | 13.6 | SonarQube |
| Function complexity | 2.4 | SonarQube |
| File complexity | 16.1 | SonarQube |
| Function complexity distribution | SonarQube | |
| File complexity distribution | SonarQube | |
| Duplicated lines | 4,792 | SonarQube |
| Duplicated blocks | 326 | SonarQube |
| Duplicated files | 129 | SonarQube |
| Duplicated lines density | 2.6% | SonarQube |
| Violations | 9,007 | SonarQube |
| Blocker violations | 131 | SonarQube |
| Critical violations | 183 | SonarQube |
| Major violations | 5,616 | SonarQube |
| Minor violations | 3,012 | SonarQube |
| Info violations | 65 | SonarQube |
| Quality profiles | SonarQube | |
| Complexity in functions | 18,240 | SonarQube |
| False positive issues | 0 | SonarQube |
| Open issues | 9,007 | SonarQube |
| Reopened issues | 0 | SonarQube |
| Confirmed issues | 0 | SonarQube |
| Sqale index | 275d | SonarQube |
| Ncloc language distribution | SonarQube | |
| Sqale rating | A | SonarQube |
| Development cost | SonarQube | |
| Sqale debt ratio | 4.5% | SonarQube |
| Choose a Risk Model: | 
Loading... |
|---|
| Indicators | Computed Score | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| License risk |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Quality risk |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Activeness risk |
|
