ASM

ASM is an all purpose Java bytecode manipulation and analysis framework.
ASM is an all purpose Java bytecode manipulation and analysis framework. It can be used to modify existing classes or to dynamically generate classes, directly in binary form. ASM provides some common bytecode transformations and analysis algorithms from which custom complex transformations and code analysis tools can be built. ASM offers similar functionality as other Java bytecode frameworks, but is focused on performance. Because it was designed and implemented to be as small and as fast as possible, it is well suited for use in dynamic systems (but can of course be used in a static way too, e.g. in compilers). See also: ASM on the Eclipse Marketplace
Web site	https://asm.ow2.io/
News	2018/10/27 - ASM 7.0 released 2018/09/29 - ASM 7.0 beta released 2018/08/05 - ASM 6.2.1 released 2018/05/24 - ASM 6.2 released 2018/03/26 - ASM 6.1.1 released 2018/03/11 - ASM 6.1 released
News feed	https://asm.ow2.io/news.xml
Project leader(s)	Eric Bruneton
Functionality	Middleware framework / Component / Tool
Status	Mature
License(s)	BSD with attribution
VCS repository(ies)	https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm
Issue tracker URL	https://gitlab.ow2.org/asm/asm/issues
Discussion channels	- General discussion mailing-list - Development mailing-list
Wikipedia page	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ObjectWeb_ASM

Releases/Downloads

SonarQube	asm
OpenHub	asm
Open Maturity Model	omm Average OMM score by category
Metrics file	metrics.json

License	# References	Source
BSD-3-Clause	286	ScanCode
Apache 2.0	1	ScanCode

409 files analyzed, 286 of them refer at least one license

Metric	Value	Type	Source
Alert status	OK	LEVEL	SonarQube
Blocker violations	1	INT	SonarQube
Branch coverage	94.3	PERCENT	SonarQube
Bugs	0	INT	SonarQube
Class complexity	76.6	FLOAT	SonarQube
Classes	35	INT	SonarQube
Code smells	22	INT	SonarQube
Cognitive complexity	1960	INT	SonarQube
Comment lines	5564	INT	SonarQube
Comment lines density	36.4	PERCENT	SonarQube
Complexity	2681	INT	SonarQube
Complexity in classes	2681	INT	SonarQube
Complexity in functions	2681	INT	SonarQube
Conditions to cover	2865	INT	SonarQube
Confirmed issues	0	INT	SonarQube
Coverage	96.9	PERCENT	SonarQube
Critical violations	2	INT	SonarQube
Development cost	291570	STRING	SonarQube
Directories	2	INT	SonarQube
Duplicated blocks	10	INT	SonarQube
Duplicated files	4	INT	SonarQube
Duplicated lines	216	INT	SonarQube
Duplicated lines density	1.2	PERCENT	SonarQube
Effort to reach maintainability rating a	0	WORK_DUR	SonarQube
False positive issues	0	INT	SonarQube
File complexity	81.2	FLOAT	SonarQube
File complexity distribution	0=7;5=1;10=5;20=6;30=7;60=1;90=6	DISTRIB	SonarQube
Files	33	INT	SonarQube
Function complexity	5.3	FLOAT	SonarQube
Function complexity distribution	1=223;2=166;4=37;6=19;8=11;10=6;12=43	DISTRIB	SonarQube
Functions	505	INT	SonarQube
Info violations	4	INT	SonarQube
Last commit date	1547578589000	MILLISEC	SonarQube
Line coverage	98.3	PERCENT	SonarQube
Lines	17743	INT	SonarQube
Lines to cover	5225	INT	SonarQube
Major violations	6	INT	SonarQube
Minor violations	9	INT	SonarQube
Ncloc	9719	INT	SonarQube
Ncloc language distribution	java=9719	DATA	SonarQube
Open issues	22	INT	SonarQube
Reliability rating	1.0	RATING	SonarQube
Reliability remediation effort	0	WORK_DUR	SonarQube
Reopened issues	0	INT	SonarQube
Security rating	1.0	RATING	SonarQube
Security remediation effort	0	WORK_DUR	SonarQube
Skipped tests	0	INT	SonarQube
Sqale debt ratio	0.1	PERCENT	SonarQube
Sqale index	335	WORK_DUR	SonarQube
Sqale rating	1.0	RATING	SonarQube
Statements	4562	INT	SonarQube
Test errors	0	INT	SonarQube
Test execution time	13890	MILLISEC	SonarQube
Test failures	0	INT	SonarQube
Test success density	100.0	PERCENT	SonarQube
Tests	2639	INT	SonarQube
Uncovered conditions	163	INT	SonarQube
Uncovered lines	88	INT	SonarQube
Violations	22	INT	SonarQube
Vulnerabilities	0	INT	SonarQube
Wont fix issues	0	INT	SonarQube

Metric	Value	Source
OpenHub activity score	3	OpenHub
OpenHub one year contributor count	9	OpenHub
OMM configuration management	1	omm
OMM project planning	4	omm
OMM requirements	2	omm
OMM roadmap	2	omm
OMM stakeholders	7	omm

Choose a Risk Model:	info	Loading... Subject: Your Email: Content: - Feedback

Indicators

Computed Score

License risk

	Value	Normalized
Unique license	2
Ratio no license	30%
OMM License Indicator	2

Quality risk

	Value	Normalized
Blocker issues	1
Critical issues	2
Test coverage	96.9
Test success	100.0
OMM documentation	5
OMM standards	1
OMM testing process	2
OMM software environment	4
OMM commits and bug reports	5
OMM maintainability and stability	4

Activeness risk

	Value	Normalized
OpenHub activity	3
OpenHub contributor count (1 year)	9
OMM configuration management	1
OMM project planning	4
OMM requirements	2
OMM roadmap	2
OMM stakeholders	7